Page views

Friday 29 January 2016

The Neglect Of Nigeria Institute For Nigerian Languages (NINLAN) (INVESTIGATION)

 



BY UCHENNA UFOMADU
One of the abandoned blocks
One is amazed at the stagnancy and seeming total neglect of the Nigerian Institute for Nigerian Languages (NINLAN), Aba, Abia State.
 The institute was set up for the implementation of the language provisions of the National Policy on Education (NPE) (1977, revised 1981, 1998, 2004).

It was also established to serve as a degree awarding inter-university centre under the control of the National Universities Commission (NUC).

 The major objective of the institute is to serve as part of Nigeria’s cultural heritage and enhance national unity and cohesion. It is designed to help Nigeria achieve the language objectives of the National Policy on Education by mass producing quality L2 teachers of various Nigerian Languages.

 NINLAN shares common character and philosophy with other inter-university centres under the Nigeria Universities Commission(NUC). They include National French Language Village, Badagry, Lagos; the National Arabic Language Village, Ngala, Bornu State; the National Mathematical Centre, Abuja, FCT and the National Institute for Social and Economic Research (NISER), Ibadan, Oyo State.

According to an official document obtained from the institute, it outlines the aims and objectives of setting up the institute which include among other things:
-        Ability to mount L2 programmes which are obviously absent from the universities.
-    
 Ability to produce professional teachers in Nigerian Languages. It is obvious that most of our universities just produce linguists without knowledge in how to impart the knowledge in others while NINLAN will be offering B.A (Ed) Linguistics, Hausa, Igbo, Yoruba, etc.
-      
  NINLAN is specialised to run programmes that can mass-produce teachers of Nigerian Languages in a way that the universities cannot. Moreso, as the institute’s physical and human resources are not shared with other disciplines. NINLAN is straightly tailored to produce language teachers and experts.
-        L1 products of the universities are neither professional teachers nor groomed to develop and sustain the languages as they do not want to teach, anyway.
-        L1 products want to teach, if at all, only, in the areas where their languages are spoken. Therefore, we need non-Hausas to teach Hausa in non-Hausa areas, Non-Igbos to teach Igbo in non-Igbo areas, non-Yorubas to teach Yoruba in non-Yoruba areas, non-Efik to teach Efik in non-Efik areas of the country, etc.
 It is worthy of note that NCE L2 products are not good enough to teach at the secondary school level, hence they need a place where their knowledge can be upgraded to be better qualified to teach at the secondary school level. It is  only NINLAN that offers the opportunity for NCE L2 products to raise their qualification to degree level with both ease and special touch of expertise. Moreso, as it is currently, advancement to degree levels for NCE L2 products are blocked since they do not qualify for the universities’ L1 programmes.

 However, a visit to the Institute located in Aba, Abia State reveals the pitiable State of a cherished institute, trudging very far behind every other inter-university centre. It is in a shambolic condition that belittles its status and makes nonsense of the overall guiding philosophy of establishing the Institute.
The seeming alarming level of neglect compels one to ask why responsible authorities and agencies have chosen to neglect such an important and vital institution.

A drive into the massive premises reveals a picture of a severely underfunded institution which exerts excess pressure on its management in a guided bid to realize set goals.  The road which serves as the entrance and exit point of the Institute is in total bad shape.

No maintenance work seems to have been done on the road in the last 20 years. The administrative block of the Institute can hardly accommodate key management officers and perhaps, merely suitable for a local model primary or secondary school.

Also within the vast permanent site of NINLAN are about 30 foundations for buildings that have been abandoned for many years.  These were meant for erecting buildings to serve as lecture halls, hostels, administrative offices, etc, were inherited from the defunct Federal School of Arts and Science and were laid about 3 decades ago. There exists only one medium sized block which provides the lecture halls. There is only one hostel block which can hardly pass for a secondary school dormitory.

The sight of such buildings further reinforces the fact the institute is suffering grave neglect or rather, bitter ethnic politicswhich boarders on its location. Of course no, plausible reason can be adduced as to why out, of 5 inter-university centres set up almost at the same time, only the one located in the South East seems to not enjoy generous patronage from the federal government like the rest four.

The reality of under-funding thus speaks for itself.Our investigations reveal that no meaningful attention has been given to this innovative institute since inception in 1993. The institute is yet to get a take-off grant, more than 23 years after it was established. Other centres with similar aims and objectives with NINLAN have all got the approved funds and adequatefunding for basic infrastructure to function effectively over 2 decades after its establishment. There abound evidences of mindlesspolitics and discriminatory treatment by policy makers for unexplainable reasons.

Worse still, policy makers of South East extraction seem to have refused to show interest in defending the cause of a significant federal government establishment in their zone, which has a good potential of becoming a full fledged university, providing jobs to their kins and improving the economic condition of the area where it is sited.

NINLAN’S condition is a national embarrassment considering the fact it is a unique educational establishment designed to restore the nation’s pride as regards our cherished languages and cultures. Its numerous gains and advantages to the educational system in the country and Africa far outweighs whatever sentiments by those who harbor mixed feelings about the Institute. 

According to Prof. Ben Elugbe, NINLAN Executive Director, “The challenge of advocating Nigerian Languages is best faced by an institute such as NINLAN”.
It was primarily set up to develop and make Nigeria’s over 400 languages appealing to the younger generation.

It is an incontrovertible fact that NINLAN is a great idea and an ideal concept borne out of the fact that it is invariably hailed by those who hear of it. Unfortunately, most people also lament the fact that the institute is not well known because of the prolonged neglect.

According to research, NINLAN is a world-friendly concept. Experts in the education sector believe it is an idea UNESCO and other international educational bodies should applaud.  This was why in 2006 when the African Union declared 2006 a year of African Languages, many had expected then President Umaru Musa Yar’  Adua who was chairman of the AU to upgrade NINLAN for it to be able to compete with similar institutes in other countries.

The stagnant state of NINLAN indeed makes nonsense of whatever effort by the Federal Government to promote Nigerian languages.  Its neglect of NINLAN re-echoes the belief that it takes delight in celebrating foreign languages, cultures and products.  This is not only an aberration but puts a question mark on its much trumpteted plan to revive the education sector in Nigeria.

No comments:
Write comments